Poorest schools suffered funding cut under Tory reforms says watchdog

Children in a classroom (PA Wire)
2:45am, Thu 01 Jul 2021
CBAD8A00-D2B9-4E0E-ADDF-D0366C357A34 Created with sketchtool. E9A4AA46-7DC3-48B8-9CE2-D75274FB8967 Created with sketchtool. 65CCAE04-4748-4D0F-8696-A91D8EB3E7DC Created with sketchtool.

Government efforts to “level up” funding for education have resulted in cuts to the money going to the most deprived schools, the Whitehall spending watchdog has found.

The National Audit Office (NAO) said since the introduction of a national funding formula for England there had been a “relative redistribution” of resources to schools in better-off areas.

In contrast, it said, almost 60% of the most deprived fifth of schools had seen a real terms reduction in Government funding since 2017-18.

While schools in poorer areas continue to receive more support than those in better-off parts of the country, the NAO said the gap was narrowing and questioned whether the formula was leading to a fair allocation of resources.

The department must evaluate whether this funding model is matching resources to need

The findings are potentially embarrassing for Boris Johnson who shortly after entering Downing Street in July 2019 announced an increase funding under the formula with the aim of “levelling up education funding and giving all young people the same opportunities to succeed”.

The formula, first introduced in 2018-19, brought in minimum per-pupil funding levels, but because most schools with high levels of deprivation were already receiving above the minimum threshold they did not see any increase.

However, under the formula, more than one in three of the least deprived fifth of schools (37.1%) did get a rise. In all, in 2020-21 an additional £266 million was allocated to 3,150 schools – none in the poorest fifth.

The NAO said that since 2017-18, average per-pupil funding for the most deprived fifth of schools has fallen in real terms by 1.2% to £5,177,  while for the least deprived fifth it has risen by 2.9% to £4,471.

Cities with high levels of deprivation, such as Nottingham and Birmingham, as well as most London boroughs, saw cuts while local authorities with relatively low levels of deprivation in the South West, the East Midlands and the South East received increases of around 1%.

Boris Johnson with primary school children (PA Archive)

In all, 58.3% of the fifth most deprived schools suffered a real terms per pupil funding cut, including 83.6% of those Inner London.

While overall funding from the Department for Education (DfE) to schools rose from £36.2 billion in 2014-15 to £43.4 billion 2020-21, an increase in pupil numbers meant it amounted to a real terms per pupil increase of just 0.4%.

At the same time the DfE estimated that between 2015-16 and 2019-20, cost pressures on schools  outstripped funding increases by £2.2 billion, mainly because of rising staff costs.

The head of the NAO Gareth Davies said: “The Department for Education has met its objective of making the way it allocates school funding more transparent and consistent. However, it is less clear whether it has met its objective of allocating funding fairly.

“Although more deprived areas and schools continue to receive more per-pupil funding than those that are less deprived, the difference in funding has narrowed.

“The department must evaluate whether this funding model is matching resources to need.”

Sign up to our newsletter